
I have met the rate limit and I am unable to perform any operation 😦

You need to wait 60 minutes so

Why you call it more than 100 times in 60 minutes ?

If you need to test while dev, just cache response

100 times in 60 mins wow! please check this once https://appwrite.io/docs/rate-limits#abuse

I would urge to wait a bit then retry?

also seen this once https://github.com/appwrite/appwrite/issues/2953#issuecomment-1542867932


May be this is the reason

I want to check whether user exists or not. and I want to protect routes.. Could anyone suggest me any other best solution?

localStorage
is the best alternative this right ?

Ma'am!

I think , I have solved this issue...

🙂

The way we typically check if a user is authenticated is to call account.get()
. If that is successful, the user is logged in.

Yeah, I mean, If I use the above method or any other method, for every page render, that method will be called. Because I am wrapping every page with AuthProtectedRoute
Page. that's how my limit is getting over. So I am checking it for one time until the user delete the session and updating the UI through localStorage. sir.

account.get()
does not have a rate limit

I see, I dont know this. Thanks sir. 🙂 Awesome then.

Every API that has a rate limit will have it mentioned in the docs

Alright! Docs are so helpful. I am literally clearing all my doubts while reading docs. Except permissions and roles.

[SOLVED]How to increase rate limit for JWT End Point?
Recommended threads
- login backend and frontend
I'm using Remix, as my Backend (node). and react on my frontend. Until now, i did SSR login. saved the secret.. and it's fine. For many simpler requests i wish...
- Stuck in Readonly Mode After Pro Subscri...
Hello team, I really need some urgent help. I recently resubscribed to the Pro plan hoping to get back into a project I created a while ago, but I'm still unab...
- Missing C++ libstdc library in Python fu...
I have a function running Python 3.12 which suddenly started dumping errors (as of today; it worked yesterday). I hadn't changed any code so I found this odd, b...
