Next.js SSR Site Times Out on First Visit After Inactivity, Then Loads Fine on Refresh

Hey everyone,

I'm running a Next.js SSR site on a self-hosted Appwrite server (v1.9.0), and I've noticed a strange behavior that I'm hoping someone can help me understand.

The site is deployed through Appwrite Sites and is currently pre-launch, so it gets very little traffic.

Whenever the site hasn't been visited for a while, the first request often ends up showing an Appwrite timeout/error page (as shown in the screenshot). However, if I refresh a few seconds later, the site loads normally and works perfectly.

This feels similar to a cold-start issue, but I'd expect the initial request to simply take longer rather than eventually timing out and showing an error page.

My concern is that most visitors won't refresh after seeing an error page - they'll assume the site is broken and leave.

Has anyone else experienced this with Next.js SSR deployments on self-hosted Appwrite?

A few questions:

• Is this expected behavior when an SSR site has been idle for some time?
• Is there a configuration that can prevent the first request from timing out?
• Are there recommended timeout, container, or scaling settings for self-hosted Appwrite Sites running Next.js SSR?

I'd appreciate any guidance or suggestions on what to check.

Thanks!

All sites have a timeout to free up resources when not used.

To increase that there is some envs : https://appwrite.io/docs/advanced/self-hosting/configuration/environment-variables

But it first seams strange that nextjs take a very long time to spin up.

Could you check for example, when you make the first request, do you see a new container spin up instantly or like 20 second after ?
If it spin up instant, that might be that nextjs takes too much time to start with the resources constraints/specification it have (a 0.5cpu-0.5g might timeout where a 2cpu-2g might not)

Last small question you said it was a site, but the UI shows "function" is it a real site (and so just a UI bug showing the wrong resource), or a function ?

In response to this, it's a real site. I am as clueless as to why it shows functions error

Last small question you said it was a site, but the UI shows "function" is it a real site (and so just a UI bug showing the wrong resource), or a function ?

As for the container inspection, I will check this shortly

also if you have a lot of functions and others things running, it's possible that you need to scale up a bit some containers to allow more elements to run in parallel