Hi! I'm creating and testing a simple data model and I'm a bit confused about how one way relationship restrictions work with many to many relationship. I will provide an example.
I have a collection for "Users" and another collection for "Skills", every user should be able to have multiple skills. Eventually I will query users by skills but I don't want to keep track of the users in the skill collection, so I see a one way relationship.
If I make this relationship "Many to one": "members can contain one skill, skills can belong to many members" -> Then restrictions work as expected:
- Restrict: You cannot delete a skill referenced by a user, but you can delete a user that has a skill.
But if I make the relationship "Many to many" (as I want): "members can contain many skills, skills can belong to many members" -> Then restrictions work in a strange way IMHO.
- Restrict: I cannot delete users that have skills referenced but I can delete skills that are related to users.
Is this the intended behavior? I expected different behavior, more close to the "many to one" restriction, as this is a one way relation, what I expected was:
- Restrict: I shouldn't be able to delete skills that are referenced in users but I should be able to delete any user with skills without any problems.
I have IT background and I guess many to many relationships are using a hidden table to keep track of the references, and something weird must be happening with the restrictions in the pivot table.
Recommended threads
- Certificate generation failed:
Hi! I deleted my domain and added it back again. And this happens. I was trying [21:41:57] Certificate generation started. [21:42:00] Certificate generation ...
- Indian debit cards for billing?
Hey Appwrite team! 👋 I'm a developer from India building on Appwrite Cloud. Quick billing question: Does Appwrite accept **Indian debit cards** (Visa/Master...
- Can't deploy SERVER "Because of Internal...
Is there a problem with SGP Server right? Everytime I deploy a site it says Internal Server Error?