hi, i love Appwrite idea,
i have a question, so, i will be definitely self-hosting the app, but i have a question.
i will be building very heavy traffic web apps that would contain like millions of documents.
so, is it better to have a different instance of Appwrite for each heavy app or have them all in one application.
i am just looking for maintainability and continuity.
if i went to one single instance approach, is there a way to limit or increase resources for a specific project ?
and all those projects will be hosted in just a single mariadb instance and not multiple ones?
thanks!
Appwrite was designed to be 1 instance w/ multiple projects. Up to you on scaling, though.
No, you can't limit resources for a particular project.
1 instance of Appwrite = 1 database instance. When scaling, though, it is best to have a dedicated cluster for your database.
If you really would like to use Appwrite to the backend for several heavily used platforms then at this stage I think it's more optimal to run multiple instances, one for each platform. Some part of Appwrite isn't scalable efficiently
Thank you both for answering the question.
I will go with the second approach (appwrite instance for each platform) as high availability for each platform is required for me.
But for developing purposes i will only use one instance that holds all projects
[SOLVED] Multi Appwrite instances or one?
Recommended threads
- Update row sheet not loading
After right clicking a row header and click update, the sidebar fails to load (never-ending skeleton)
- Impossible to create project via CLI?
Is it possible to create a new project via the appwrite CLI ? I need to create a few projects for something I'm working on and because i don't want to do it man...
- Understanding S3 setup with appwrite
Hey, i'm planning to change the storage from local to S3, tho i have some questions to see before starting the migration. 1. Does all the `/storage/<storage_ty...