
hi, i love Appwrite idea,
i have a question, so, i will be definitely self-hosting the app, but i have a question.
i will be building very heavy traffic web apps that would contain like millions of documents.
so, is it better to have a different instance of Appwrite for each heavy app or have them all in one application.
i am just looking for maintainability and continuity.
if i went to one single instance approach, is there a way to limit or increase resources for a specific project ?
and all those projects will be hosted in just a single mariadb instance and not multiple ones?
thanks!

Appwrite was designed to be 1 instance w/ multiple projects. Up to you on scaling, though.
No, you can't limit resources for a particular project.
1 instance of Appwrite = 1 database instance. When scaling, though, it is best to have a dedicated cluster for your database.

If you really would like to use Appwrite to the backend for several heavily used platforms then at this stage I think it's more optimal to run multiple instances, one for each platform. Some part of Appwrite isn't scalable efficiently

Thank you both for answering the question.
I will go with the second approach (appwrite instance for each platform) as high availability for each platform is required for me.
But for developing purposes i will only use one instance that holds all projects

[SOLVED] Multi Appwrite instances or one?
Recommended threads
- cli 5.0.5 command for pull and push of d...
Hi i am using selfhosted appwrite 1.5.10, for migration (duplicate project) purpose i am using cli 5.0.5, but i am unable to find commands for pull and push, wh...
- 404 for self-host
docker-compose.yml: x-logging: &x-logging logging: driver: 'json-file' options: max-file: '5' max-size: '10m' services: traefik: ima...
- Is p-limit compatible with Appwrite?
I have a function that makes asynchronous calls to different Appwrite collections. This is how I make the call: ```js await Promise.allSettled([ ...
