
For your use-case I'll create collection that no user has reading access, and each user will get reading access to is own.
That means no one get writing access.
So, all the writing access gonna be through a function.

Is this make sense?

yeah but I can use nodejs instead of functions right or would you recommend against that?

You mean access node-appwrite
using your nodejs project?

Yup

That will great.

I've suggested function because the is most-common

But any server side logic is good

alright and how would I for instance store it?

just a integer or is there something that is more "secure" that you know of

Mmm, You mean in case someone gained access to your database?

yeah

I think at the end even banks use Integer (float) for the amount value.

I don't think putting it behind some secret-logic will make it more secure.

Hmm yeah prob I am overthinking it

Just make sure to protect the database.

Yeah that wouldnt be too hard

Like, I assume that if someone got access to your Appwrite, then the attacker will grab or change other stuff.

It's a right way of tackling it Let me check something.

From what I see in that topic The best logic be like that, You'll have two collections
The Wallets collection that will simply have
- wallet_id
- user_id
Then the Transactions collection that will have
- wallet_id
- amount (minus or plus)
And the wallet value will be the sum of all the transactions documents, So in start you'll give each user for example plus transaction with 100

Oh yeah thats way smarter to calculate the transactions then just store it as a integer

Of course you can add more attributes to the trabnsaction table so it easy to track

Yeah

Thanks!

[SOLVED] How should I save a instore wallet in Appwrite
Recommended threads
- Invalid document structure: unknown attr...
Unexpected error while trying to add a domain. Not sure if this has any relation to this, but I have updated to v1.6.2 from v1.6.0 recently.
- Appwrite New York is 500 Internal Error
- How to Query more than 25 items from the...
So I've added this to my query to try and defeat the default 25 item limit: ``` do { const response = await databases.listDocuments( ...
