ResolvedDatabases

[SOLVED] How to include queries in the basic get request?

Dec 27, 2023, 21:16

View on Discord

Votes

Replies

Participants

Unknown

Messages

ArgelOriginal post

Rank 1: Thread

May 16, 2023, 09:13

Please, what is to correct way that the URL should look like?

I looked at the documentation, but it's unclear to me. And I cannot figure this out for hours already.

https://appwrite.io/docs/rest#client-auth

Summary

The user had a problem including queries in a basic GET request. They tried using Insomnia but it didn't work, so they switched to Postman. They shared an example of the query they used but still couldn't get it to work. Other users suggested trying to pass the query in the URL and as an object in the request body, but the user was still unsure about the correct format. No solution was provided in the thread.

safwan

May 16, 2023, 09:18

You have to pass the queries as an object in the request body

Argel

Rank 1: Thread

May 16, 2023, 09:34

Sorry still I cannot figure this out. Please 🙏 how should I correctly fill this?

Argel

Rank 1: Thread

May 16, 2023, 09:34

This results in this:

> GET /v1/databases/63a97cf0a759183bd1c6/collections/63a97d42d1d2518dea90/documentsHTTP/1.1 HTTP/1.1
> Host: appwrite.app.timenoder.com
> User-Agent: insomnia/2023.1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=X-INSOMNIA-BOUNDARY
> X-Appwrite-Project: 64631bad5cbf9ab42392
> Accept: */*
> Content-Length: 126

| --X-INSOMNIA-BOUNDARY
| Content-Disposition: form-data; name="queries[]"
| equal("name", ["Test2"])
| --X-INSOMNIA-BOUNDARY--

Binyamin

May 16, 2023, 10:04

Can you try to pass it in the URL?

Binyamin

May 16, 2023, 10:04

As such

Binyamin

May 16, 2023, 10:07

documents?queries[]=Query.equal("name", ["Test2"])

Binyamin

May 16, 2023, 10:07

Let me know if that works

Argel

Rank 1: Thread

May 16, 2023, 10:20

Finally 🙏

The problem was in Insomnia (through which I am making the API calls), it does something unxespected. The solution was in using Postman.

Thank you for responding!. But close enough :).