Rank 2: Process
and you can use labels as permissions
Votes
0
Replies
24
Participants
Unknown
Messages
25
Rank 2: Process
and you can use labels as permissions
Then you set the collection to subscriber only
If a user does not have that label then he won't be able to access that collection
It is easier than your initial plan
Rank 2: Process
okay. i get what you're saying. so to rectify my thought process.. instead of restricting user account, use permissions.
And you should not disallow account creation
Rank 2: Process
i guess what i don't see is if a user didn't create an account, and they subscribe they still can't access premium content/services.
What happens if the subscription runs out? Do you want to delete the account?
Rank 2: Process
good point. i didn't think that far
Then that user would lose all settings, progress, etc as well
Rank 2: Process
prob don't want to delete the account
No one wants that
Rank 2: Process
yeah. that would be a hurdle .. more effort should be for them to re-subscribe.. but keep their content.. just restrict what they can access.
Yeah that's the normal procedure
Your intial plan can be realized too but it is way more complex than it needs to be
Rank 2: Process
i was following the lead of another app i saw. but my guess is they had a specific use case, and perhaps used rto allow account creation as a parrallel feature to subscriptions
I have made an app somewhat similiar to what you described too. Where registration is restricted
But only because it is a closed community
That's why I asked whether that is really nessecary
Rank 2: Process
well. that was my idea.. to join the community you needed to be a paying member
Rank 2: Process
i don't have much for a non-paying member aside from creating workouts using the app
Rank 2: Process
trying to not lock that feature down
You have to keep in mind that you should still allow access to your app and certain services to non members
If not apple and google won't allow your app
Rank 2: Process
right