I had a function that made 3 requests to the OpenAI API with 3 different prompts. This function took more than 30 seconds to respond and gave a timeout. So I divided it into 3 functions, each one making a request to the OpenAI API in parallel. However, they still took more than 30 seconds to respond.
@Steven suggested that they be run asynchronously, but this is creating a queue of executions. While one is processed, the other two are waiting.
Is it possible to execute a function asynchronously but without a queue being created?
No. Perhaps you need to horizontally scale out your function workers
You are saying that if i execute it sync, making 3 requests to 3 different functions, it runs in parallel. But making the same 3 requests with async option, it creates a queue, and the only way to avoid it is scaling out?
Recommended threads
- TablesDB `updateRows` returns `database_...
Hi Appwrite team! I’m seeing a strange issue with TablesDB bulk row updates on a self-hosted Appwrite instance. **Environment** - Appwrite self-hosted `1.9.0` ...
- [SOLVED] Realtime Missing Channels
```js useEffect(() => { let subscription: RealtimeSubscription; async function loadChips() { try { const {rows: chi...
- Functions executed by events does not ap...
Hello, Running self-hosted Appwrite version 1.9.0 (with console 7.8.26). When functions are triggered by an event (eg. databases.\*tables.\*.rows.\*.create) doe...